Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626100›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2026

Predicting changes in U.S. county health: What does machine learning tell us about multiple determinants of health.

Di Yang, David Vanness

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Di YangLSE Health, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5749-9004
David VannessDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Understanding multiple determinants of health and their contributions to premature mortality is essential for policymaking in population health. As an exploratory forecasting exercise, we aimed to analyze the associations between multiple determinants of health and improvement in premature mortality in U.S. counties. Methods: Using County Health Rankings data on health determinants from 2010-2014, we predicted changes in premature mortality from 2015 to 2019. We used Extreme Gradient Boosting, which allows for flexible functional estimates of a multi-dimensional health production function, to assess the association between improvement in premature mortality and pre-period health determinants. We made Accumulated Local Effects plots to illustrate these associations and conducted a conventional spatial regression as a robustness check. Results: We find a negative association between the baseline some-college rate (percentage of adults aged 25-44 with some post-secondary education) and change in premature mortality. A one-percentage-point increase in the baseline some-college rate in 2010-2014 is associated with a reduction of premature mortality by 9.57 years of potential life lost per 100,000 population from 2015 to 2019. The magnitude of the association for each county varied based on each county's baseline some-college rate. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that improvements in post-secondary education are associated with relatively large, yet variable, gains in population health across U.S. counties. Applying machine learning methods to estimate a county-level health production function can inform tailored policies to improve local population health.

Indexed as

machine learningmultiple determinants of healthpopulation healthpremature mortalityXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42626100
PMCPMC13490815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.