Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626093›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Stabilizing Na

Inbar Anconina, Thomas Leirikh, Diana Golodnitsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inbar AnconinaSchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3362-8052
Thomas LeirikhSchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Diana GolodnitskySchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-190X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly-(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based solid polymer electrolytes are attractive for sodium metal batteries but suffer from interfacial instability when coupled with layered oxide cathodes. Here, sodium β″-alumina (SBA) was tested as an ion-conducting filler in a PEO-based composite solid polymer electrolyte (CSPE) and as a major component of a composite cathode interlayer deposited via electrophoretic deposition using a polymeric ionic liquid (PIL). Although the solid polymer electrolyte without ceramic filler and the CSPE exhibited comparable ionic conductivity at 60 °C, the CSPE displayed lower activation energy and improved cell durability, underscoring the importance of ceramic reinforcement beyond bulk transport considerations. Within this stabilized CSPE platform, the SBA-PIL interlayer effectively regulated the cathode-electrolyte interface of layered Na

Identifiers

PMID42626093
PMCPMC13491471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.