Karyotypic diversity in the Gobiidae: A comparative analysis of two Atlantic species.

Paulo Augusto de Lima-Filho, Gideão Wagner Werneck Félix da Costa, Simião Alefe Soares da Silva, Wagner Franco Molina

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paulo Augusto de Lima-FilhoInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz - RN, Brazil Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Norte Santa Cruz Brazil https://ror.org/04je48v27.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-6860

Gideão Wagner Werneck Félix da CostaDepartamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal - RN, Brazil Departamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Natal Brazil https://ror.org/04wn09761.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7899-2677

Simião Alefe Soares da SilvaDepartamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal - RN, Brazil Departamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Natal Brazil https://ror.org/04wn09761.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6503-3174

Wagner Franco MolinaDepartamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal - RN, Brazil Departamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Natal Brazil https://ror.org/04wn09761.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-0952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gobies (family Gobiidae) rank among the most diverse of all marine fish families. Although the cytogenetics of these small, ubiquitous fish is still a young field, studies on Atlantic species, despite their limited number, have already revealed a remarkable level of karyotypic variation. This karyotype diversity has provided critical evidence for discovering new species, uncovering population structures, identifying sex chromosomes, and pinpointing major shifts in repetitive DNA. This study presents the first chromosomal characterization of two Atlantic goby species,

Indexed as

Atlantic fishesChromosomal rearrangementsfish cytogeneticskaryotype evolution

Identifiers

PMID42626064

DOI10.3897/compcytogen.20.206266

PMCPMC13491010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.