ArticleCureus2026
Benchmarking Early Unplanned Trauma Re-operations: A Five-Year Institutional Review of 7,400 Orthopaedic Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Unplanned re-operations within 28 days of trauma surgery play a pivotal role in orthopaedic care and represent a critical indicator of surgical quality and postoperative complications. It has important consequences for patient outcomes and resource allocation in healthcare inefficiencies. This original article investigates over 7,400 orthopaedic trauma cases to detail the incidence, etiology, and timing of early re-operative procedures while presenting contemporary benchmarks for clinical governance and service improvement. Methods A retrospective institutional review was conducted of all orthopaedic trauma surgeries performed at Luton and Dunstable Teaching Hospital (LDH) between January 2019 and June 2024. A total of 7,486 procedures were screened, and all unplanned returns to theatre within 28 days (n = 53) were analyzed. Variables collected included patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, surgical site, indication, timing, surgeon grade, microbiology, and outcomes. Statistical analysis included exact binomial confidence intervals (CIs), chi-square tests, Welch's t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results Across 7,486 trauma operations, 53 patients required an unplanned return to theatre within 28 days, giving an incidence of 0.71% (95% CI: 0.53%-0.93%). Among re-operated cases, infection was the commonest indication at 40% (95% CI: 26.5%-54.0%), followed by implant/fixation failure at 26% (95% CI: 15.3%-40.3%) and dislocation at 19% (95% CI: 9.4%-32.0%). Age differed significantly by indication for re-operation (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.028), with dislocation cases occurring more in older patients. ASA grade also differed by indication (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.010). Hip/femur re-operation cases were significantly older than non-hip/femur cases (Welch's t-test, p < 0.000001). No significant difference in cause distribution by sex was observed (χ², p = 0.486). Most re-operations (72%) occurred between postoperative weeks 2 and 3. Culture positivity was identified in 57% of infection-related cases, predominantly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.