Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626049›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of methodology2026

Prognostic impact of right ventricular dilatation and echocardiography use criteria in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Arnold Méndez-Toro, Ingrid Tatiana Rojas-Ruiz, Luis Eduardo Silva-DiazGranados, Andrés Ruano-Cadena, Manuel Agustín Paz-Meneses, Ricardo Andrés Novoa-Alvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arnold Méndez-ToroDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia/Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota 111321, Bogotá, Colombia. arnold.mendez@hun.edu.co.
Ingrid Tatiana Rojas-RuizFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota 111321, Bogotá, Colombia.
Luis Eduardo Silva-DiazGranadosDepartment of Cardiology, Sigandini, Bogota 110110, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés Ruano-CadenaInternal Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota 110110, Bogotá, Colombia.
Manuel Agustín Paz-MenesesDepartment of Cardiology, Clinica Colombia, Bogota 110110, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ricardo Andrés Novoa-AlvarezResearch and Innovation Center, Navarra University Foundation, Neiva 410001, Huila, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] infection created unprecedented diagnostic and logistical pressures. Given the established potential for cardiac injury and the critical need to optimize scarce resources, establishing the clinical utility and prognostic value of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) became imperative.

aimTo evaluate the prognostic predictors and the adherence to appropriate use criteria (AUC) for TTE in a highly affected setting.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing records from patients with confirmed COVID-19 who underwent TTE. Socio-demographic, biochemical, and echocardiographic parameters were collected. Mortality was the primary outcome. We assessed inter-observer agreement (Kappa statistic) for TTE indications (based on American College of Cardiology Foundation 2011 and American Society of Echocardiography 2020 guidelines) and the determination of clinical impact (a subsequent change in patient management).

resultsTotal 149 patients were analyzed. Median age was 66 years [interquartile range (IQR): 56-73], median hospital stay was 13 days (IQR: 6-23). Overall and intensive care unit mortality rates were 39.6% and 60%, respectively. Elevated biochemical markers (leukocytes, neutrophils, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein) were associated with mortality. Crucially, right ventricular (RV) dilatation and/or strain (

conclusionRV pathology is a potent, quantifiable prognostic indicator. While AUC demonstrated high reliability, the significant and frequent changes in management suggest that the current guidelines may possess inherent limitations when addressing the unique, acute prognostic complexities of severe COVID-19 disease.

Indexed as

Appropriate use criteriaCOVID-19EchocardiographyPrognosisRight ventricular strainSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID42626049
PMCPMC13491187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.