ReviewCoral reefs (Online)2026
Acute heat-stress testing in coral bleaching research: a review of research using the Coral Bleaching Automated Stress System (CBASS).
Review in Coral reefs (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As climate change intensifies, identifying heat-resistant corals is essential for advancing coral-bleaching research and informing reef conservation and restoration. The Coral Bleaching Automated Stress System (CBASS) is designed to meet this need by conducting acute heat-stress assays within a standardized methodological framework. Given its affordability and short duration, CBASS use has increased since 2020, warranting a first review of its application. Here, we assess (1) the scope of CBASS research including geographic and species representation, (2) variation in experimental design, (3) the range of measured response variables, and (4) how CBASS-derived heat responses compare with those from longer-duration experiments and in situ surveys. We then synthesize these findings to identify advantages and limitations and suggest improvements. We show that CBASS studies exhibit taxonomic and depth biases similar to other coral-bleaching experiments. Most studies include adequate biological replication but insufficient tank replication. Temperature treatments were highly standardized, whereas rationales for selecting light levels were lacking. Frequent tissue sloughing and mortality in the highest temperature treatment underscore the need to re-evaluate the use of extreme temperatures. Chlorophyll fluorescence and associated dose-response metrics such as ED50 were the most commonly measured response variables, but standardization and reporting warrant improvement. Notably, in-depth review of the few studies comparing acute and longer-duration stress assays indicates that it remains unresolved whether CBASS-derived coral responses reliably predict coral performance under real-world heatwave scenarios. Consequently, we caution relying solely on acute stress assays to inform reef conservation and genotype selection for restoration planning until further validation is achieved. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00338-026-02862-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.