Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626031›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Personalized Perioperative Music Listening: A Human-Centered Approach to Precision Anesthesia.

Michael Egbujionuma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael EgbujionumaAnesthesia, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern anesthesia has achieved remarkable advances in safety, monitoring, and pharmacologic precision, yet perioperative anxiety continues to be a common and under-addressed aspect of surgical care, affecting a substantial proportion of patients undergoing surgery. Patients increasingly request personalized music during transport to the operating room and prior to anesthetic induction. Although often viewed as a comfort measure, this practice may represent an important component of a wider movement toward human-centered perioperative care. This narrative review summarizes contemporary evidence on perioperative music listening interventions and proposes a framework for integrating individualized sensory preferences into anesthesia practice. Sixteen empirical studies, including major systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials, are synthesized across general surgery, cardiac surgery, obstetric anesthesia, intensive care, awake craniotomy, orthopedic and breast cancer surgery, and pediatric anesthesia. The evidence generally demonstrates reductions in preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, sedative requirements, and selected physiologic stress responses, with one randomized trial reporting greater anxiety reduction with music than with oral midazolam premedication. A neurochemical mechanism involving dopaminergic reward circuitry, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis modulation, immune mediators, and oxytocinergic social-affiliation pathways is also reviewed. A practical perioperative workflow, comparison with prior reviews, and a research agenda focused on personalization and digital perioperative profiling are presented. Personalized perioperative music listening is a low-cost, scalable, evidence-supported intervention that may help anesthesia evolve toward a more humane, patient-centered surgical experience.

Indexed as

anxiolytic premedicationemergence deliriummusic listeningnarrative reviewnurse anesthesiapatient-centered anesthesiaperioperative music listening interventionprecision anesthesiapreoperative anxiety

Identifiers

PMID42626031
PMCPMC13491375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.