ArticleHuman mutation2026
Mutation-Immune Crosstalk Contextualizes CAF-Associated ARPC1A Programs and Cisplatin Response in Gastric Cancer.
Article in Human mutation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cisplatin response in gastric cancer is shaped by malignant cell programs, stromal states, and mutation-immune crosstalk, but the CAF subtypes linked to platinum tolerance and their epithelial effectors remain incompletely defined. We integrated single-cell RNA sequencing, epithelial CNV-like inference, fibroblast reclustering, CellChat analysis, signature scoring, hdWGCNA, CAF-epithelial coupling, exploratory GSE14209 evaluation, TCGA-STAD mutation/copy-number contextualization, and DepMap CRISPR virtual knockout analysis, followed by experimental validation in AGS and HGC-27 cells. IGF1+ CXCL12+ CAFs showed resistance-supportive stromal features, and CAF-epithelial coupling prioritized ARPC1A as a tumor epithelial candidate associated with this stromal program. In TCGA-STAD, ARPC1A mutations were rare and consisted of three missense and two frameshift variants without a recurrent hotspot; the mutant tumors were confined to the MSI subtype and showed an immune-activated, high TMB/MSI context, indicating mutation-immune crosstalk rather than a clear mutation-specific CAF, EMT, drug resistance, or cisplatin response phenotype. By contrast, ARPC1A copy-number gain/amplification was more frequent and tracked with ARPC1A expression, CIN enrichment, aneuploidy, and fraction of genome altered. DepMap CRISPR data indicated mostly weak-to-mild baseline ARPC1A dependency in upper GI and gastric/GEJ models. Experimentally, ARPC1A knockdown increased cisplatin sensitivity, promoted cisplatin-induced apoptosis, and suppressed migration and invasion. These findings identify a CAF-associated ARPC1A epithelial program linked to cisplatin response and support a mutation-immune/copy-number framework in which ARPC1A is interpreted mainly through immune-contextual mutation patterns and expression dosage rather than recurrent gain-of-function mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.