ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Real-world determinants of time to initiation of anti-amyloid treatments: comparative data from private and academic practice settings.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarlier anti-amyloid therapy (AAT) initiation results in improved clinical outcomes in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We sought to identify demographic, clinical, and disease-related factors impacting door-to-treatment times (DTTs).
methodsA retrospective review of AAT data was conducted at private and academic neurological practices.
resultsA total of 329 patients (53.2% from private versus 46.8% academic practices), mean age 73.5 ± 7.2 (55.3% female), with most being non-Hispanic White were treated with lecanemab (81.2%) or donanemab (18.2%). DTTs were significantly reduced ( DISCUSSION: Patients with private insurance may experience greater delay in DTT, whereas BBBs may reduce DTT relative to traditional confirmatory biomarkers. DTT improves with clinic experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.