ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2026
Kidney replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in low-resource settings: Lessons from Africa.
Review in World journal of nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a disproportionate burden in low-resource settings. In these regions, AKI is commonly community-acquired, affects younger patients, and is frequently related to sepsis, hypovolemia, obstetric complications, nephrotoxins, and infections. Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is a cornerstone of supportive care for severe AKI, but its use is strongly shaped by local infrastructure, cost, workforce, and supply chains. Current evidence does not show consistent superiority of continuous KRT, intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), prolonged intermittent KRT, or peritoneal dialysis (PD) in broad AKI populations with respect to survival or kidney recovery. Accordingly, modality choice should be individualized according to patient characteristics and local feasibility. In many African and other low-resource settings, IHD and PD remain the dominant modalities because they are more accessible and scalable than continuous therapies. This review discusses how resource limitations shape AKI KRT practice, with emphasis on Africa, and outlines pragmatic strategies to improve equitable access to life-saving renal support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.