Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626008›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Nonlinear and inequality-related heterogeneity in green cooling across Chinese urban agglomerations: a SHAP-based random forest analysis.

Zimo Zhang, Zhijie Yang, Luoman Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zimo ZhangCollege of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Zhijie YangSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Luoman OuyangSichuan Institute of Land and Spatial Planning, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land surface temperature (LST) is increasing with rapid urbanization and climate warming. However, the relative roles of green quantity, vegetation condition, and inequality in local green resource availability in shaping the urban thermal environment remain insufficiently understood across regions. This study examined built-up areas in five major Chinese urban agglomerations. A Random Forest model combined with SHAP analysis was used to quantify the relative importance of green-related, natural background, built-environment, and socio-economic variables and to identify their nonlinear associations with LST. Green-related variables contributed consistently across the five urban agglomerations, although their contribution structures differed markedly among regions. NDVI generally showed stronger explanatory power than green cover. The weighted Gini coefficient of local green resource availability exhibited a strongly nonlinear and region-dependent association with LST. Cross-regional comparisons indicated greater sensitivity to changes in the weighted Gini coefficient in the Yangtze River Delta and weaker responses in the Chengdu-Chongqing region. SHAP results further indicated that built-environment morphology was also relevant alongside green-related variables. Built-up density consistently showed positive SHAP values. These findings provide interpretable cross-regional evidence for heat-mitigation planning. Effective strategies should prioritize vegetation quality, the spatial continuity of green resources, and a more balanced distribution of green space rather than focusing solely on the total quantity of green space.

Indexed as

TemperatureChinaCitiesHumansRandom ForestUrbanizationGini coefficientgreen covergreen equitynonlinear effectsurban thermal environment

Identifiers

PMID42626008
PMCPMC13490196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.