ArticleTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
Comment on: Knowledge, role and perceptions of male partners on pre-eclampsia in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies.
Article in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-eclampsia is a serious pregnancy condition that requires early recognition and timely care. A recent review by Asiedu and colleagues showed that male partners may support women during pregnancy through financial preparation, shared decision-making, emotional support, household assistance, and information sharing. This Letter acknowledges the importance of that review but qualifies its policy message: partner involvement should be woman-centered, non-coercive, and linked to practical emergency preparedness rather than assumed to be essential or sufficient on its own. Delays in receiving care are influenced not only by knowledge but also by cost, transportation, family decision-making, distance, and the readiness of health facilities. Male partners' roles differ across households and communities. Some women may rely on other trusted relatives, friends, or community members. Therefore, counseling programs should not assume that involving a male partner will always improve care or make male attendance a condition for receiving services. With the woman's informed consent, pre-eclampsia counseling may include male partners and other trusted household decision-makers. Programs should ensure equitable access regardless of partner status and monitor for unintended harms, including coercion, increased surveillance, and gender-based violence. Counseling should focus on recognizing danger signs, saving emergency funds, arranging transportation, identifying referral facilities and contact persons, and deciding who may accompany the woman or communicate with health care providers during an emergency. Male partners can be valuable sources of support, but their involvement must respect women's choices, autonomy, safety, and preferred support networks. The goal is not simply to increase men's attendance or presence, but to strengthen the practical support that helps women obtain timely, safe, and respectful care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.