Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625971›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of methodology2026

Artificial intelligence in onco-anaesthesia: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.

Prashant Sirohiya, Prateek Maurya, Nishkarsh Gupta, Brajesh Kumar Ratre, Saurabh Vig, Sidharth Puri, Balbir Kumar, Raghav Gupta, Shweta Bhopale, Anuja Pandit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Prashant SirohiyaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute (Jhajjar), AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India. prashantsirohiya@aiims.edu.
Prateek MauryaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute (Jhajjar), AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Nishkarsh GuptaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Brajesh Kumar RatreDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Saurabh VigDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute (Jhajjar), AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Sidharth PuriDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, SGHS Hospital, Mohali 140308, Punjab, India.
Balbir KumarDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute (Jhajjar), AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Raghav GuptaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute (Jhajjar), AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Shweta BhopaleDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute (Jhajjar), AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Anuja PanditDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute (Jhajjar), AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming onco-anaesthesia by shifting practice from reactive physiological management toward predictive and precision-based care. This review outlines current AI applications across the perioperative cancer pathway. Preoperatively, machine learning and deep learning models enhance risk stratification through automated frailty assessment, electronic health record phenotyping, and prediction of cancer-specific outcomes. Intraoperatively, AI-enabled technologies such as closed-loop anaesthesia delivery systems, predictive haemodynamic monitoring, and automated depth-of-anaesthesia control optimize drug dosing, reduce physiological stress, and may help preserve perioperative immune function, with potential implications for long-term oncologic outcomes. Postoperatively, AI-driven integration of multimodal data-including genomics, radiomics, wearable biosignals, and high-resolution physiological waveforms-facilitates early detection of complications such as delirium, persistent pain, acute kidney injury, and anastomotic leakage. The review also examines the role of AI in evaluating the "onco-anaesthesia hypothesis" by clarifying links between anaesthetic techniques, inflammation, and cancer recurrence. Despite these advances, significant challenges persist, including data heterogeneity, limited generalisability, algorithmic opacity, regulatory uncertainty, and ethical concerns related to equity and clinical implementation. Future progress will depend on explainable AI, federated learning, real-time clinical decision-support systems, and validation through large, prospective studies to fully realise AI's potential in personalised onco-anaesthetic care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCancer recurrenceClosed-loop anesthesiaHemodynamic monitoringMachine learningOnco-anaesthesiaPerioperative medicinePersonalized medicinePredictive analyticsSurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID42625971
PMCPMC13491179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.