ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2026
Renal replacement therapies in the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.
Review in World journal of nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) remains a significant cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury, particularly in patients undergoing interventional radiology and cardiology procedures. Despite the implementation of preventive measures, such as intravenous hydration, pharmacologic prophylaxis, and minimization of contrast exposure, CA-AKI continues to be associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, elevated mortality rates, and greater healthcare costs. Renal replacement therapies (RRT), including haemodialysis and hemofiltration, have been explored as potential strategies to prevent CA-AKI in high-risk populations. However, the existing evidence is inconclusive. While certain studies report a reduced incidence of CA-AKI with early hemofiltration in select patient groups, others have found no significant advantage over standard hydration protocols. Furthermore, practical concerns, including procedural risks, cost implications, and logistical constraints, limit the routine use of prophylactic RRTs in clinical practice. Current clinical guidelines do not endorse the widespread use of RRTs for CA-AKI prevention, though selective application in very high-risk patients may be considered. Robust, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to identify patient subgroups that might derive benefit from this intervention. In the interim, optimized hydration and contrast minimization remain the cornerstone strategies for CA-AKI prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.