ReviewWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2026
Current and forthcoming pharmacotherapies for adolescent obesity: Evidence-based review.
Review in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of adolescent obesity has increased substantially in recent decades. This disease affects more than 20% of young people. Obesity is associated with metabolic disorders and heart disease. Conservative treatments are not effective in severe obesity. Therefore, this minireview aims to compare and clarify the effectiveness of treatments. It also seeks to identify areas requiring attention to guide clinical practice and future research. A literature search was conducted in databases including PubMed and Scopus. The study focused on randomised trials and meta-analyses in patients aged 12 to 18 years and lasting more than 12 weeks. The results show an improvement induced by glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide. Semaglutide reduces body mass index by 16.1%. It is more effective than liraglutide in improving insulin sensitivity. The use of these drugs faces challenges, such as cost. There are also social inequalities that affect health equity. Although no short-term safety issues have been reported, there is still little information available on Tirzepatide and CagriSema in adolescents, compared to their known effect on adults. Therefore, we conclude that semaglutide is the current gold standard, but that there is an urgent need for longer-term studies, comparative evaluations, and safety trials that include paediatric cohorts in order to ensure safe access to pharmacological innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.