ArticleArchives of Razi Institute2025
Investigation of
Article in Archives of Razi Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Listeriosis, an important food-borne zoonotic disease, is caused by the member of Listeriaceae family. The aim of the present study was to detect the presence of Materials & Methods: A total of 62 aborted fetuses and 288 vaginal swabs were collected from sheep and goat flocks across nine cities. For molecular analyses, conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was employed to detect the Listeria genome after extracting DNA from the abomasal contents of examined aborted fetuses. Histopathological examinations were also conducted on formalin-fixed tissue samples from the aborted fetuses. Results: In microbiological study, the organism was isolated in 1.24% of abomasal contents, 2.43% of vaginal swaps, and 3.72% of the fetus's brain. Molecular analyses showed that Conclusion: In conclusion, the detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.