ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Xiyanping injection for severe pneumonia: a target trial emulation protocol using real-world data.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe pneumonia remains a major public health challenge characterized by high mortality. Xiyanping Injection (XYP) is a Traditional Chinese Medicine injectable preparation whose core active constituent is andrographolide sulfonate, a sulfonated derivative of andrographolide extracted from Methods: We will emulate a pragmatic target trial using multicenter electronic health records. Time zero will be aligned with the date of confirmed severe pneumonia diagnosis, and a new-user design will be implemented to reduce immortal time bias and prevalent user bias. We will compare XYP combined with standard care versus standard care alone. The primary outcomes are 28-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital mortality. Missing data will be handled using machine-learning-based imputation tailored to variable types. The clone-censor-weight method will serve as the primary analytical strategy. The instrumental variable approach will be used as a secondary method to explore residual confounding. We will further apply causal forests to estimate conditional average treatment effects and to explore potential treatment-effect heterogeneity and high-benefit subgroups. A multistage dose-response analysis will examine the association between continuous XYP dosing and clinical outcomes to explore potential dosing patterns and therapeutic windows. Discussion: This protocol applies a rigorous causal inference framework to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of XYP as adjunctive treatment for severe pneumonia. The study is expected to provide real-world evidence to inform future evaluation of XYP in real-world clinical practice and to provide a replicable TTE-based methodological template for real-world evaluation of other Traditional Chinese Medicine injections. Clinical Trial Registration: https://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/, Identifier ITMCTR2026000820.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.