ArticleClinical case reports2026
Multidisciplinary Management of a Permanent Maxillary Lateral Incisor Fused to a Palatally-Positioned Supernumerary Tooth With Shared Pulp Anatomy: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fusion between a permanent tooth and a supernumerary tooth is a rare developmental anomaly, particularly when the teeth share pulp anatomy, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. This case involved a 10-year-old boy with an esthetic concern caused by a supernumerary tooth fused to the palatal aspect of the permanent maxillary left lateral incisor. CBCT imaging revealed a rare configuration consisting of a shared coronal pulp chamber with separate apical constrictions. A multidisciplinary, phased treatment approach was implemented, including endodontic therapy with placement of an MTA apical barrier, surgical recontouring while preserving periodontal tissues, and orthodontic space redistribution. At the 12-month follow-up, clinical and radiographic evaluation showed favorable healing, stable periodontal and periapical health, satisfactory esthetics, and high patient and parent satisfaction, as assessed by informal verbal feedback and clinical interview at follow-up visits. This case highlights that careful multidisciplinary planning and staged endodontic, surgical, and orthodontic management can successfully treat complex fusion anomalies, preserving function, esthetics, and periodontal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.