ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Preparation of B. Braun Easypump
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) enables patients to receive intravenous antimicrobials outside hospital settings. Elastomeric infusion devices facilitate continuous antibiotic delivery; however, limited stability data and constrained aseptic unit capacity have led some services to adopt nurse-led 'fresh-fill' preparation in uncontrolled environments, which may increase microbial contamination risk. Objectives: To evaluate whether preparation of B. Braun Easypump Methods: Forty-six elastomeric devices were prepared with tryptic soy broth by eight operators across three uncontrolled rooms using either Chemfort Results: No contamination occurred in devices prepared using CSTDs (0/23), whereas 5/23 (22%) prepared using needles were contaminated. This difference was statistically significant ( Conclusions: Preparation using Chemfort
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.