Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625832›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Emotion recognition from body movement through interpretable motion-aware sequential modeling.

Sergio Esteban-Romero, Iván Martín-Fernández, Rubén San-Segundo, Manuel Gil-Martín, Fernando Fernández-Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio Esteban-RomeroGrupo de Tecnología del Habla y Aprendizaje Automático (THAU Group), Information Processing and Telecommunications Center, E.T.S.I. de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Iván Martín-FernándezGrupo de Tecnología del Habla y Aprendizaje Automático (THAU Group), Information Processing and Telecommunications Center, E.T.S.I. de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Rubén San-SegundoGrupo de Tecnología del Habla y Aprendizaje Automático (THAU Group), Information Processing and Telecommunications Center, E.T.S.I. de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Gil-MartínGrupo de Tecnología del Habla y Aprendizaje Automático (THAU Group), Information Processing and Telecommunications Center, E.T.S.I. de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Fernández-MartínezGrupo de Tecnología del Habla y Aprendizaje Automático (THAU Group), Information Processing and Telecommunications Center, E.T.S.I. de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion recognition from bodily movement remains a challenging problem, particularly when only pose-based motion sequences are available and emotionally informative content is not uniformly distributed across time. In this work, we propose a Window Transformer architecture grounded in the Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) paradigm to address this challenge. Rather than processing the full sequence as a single temporal stream, the model decomposes it into overlapping windows and learns to assign greater relevance to those segments containing stronger emotional content. This formulation provides a more interpretable framework, since the learned relevance scores reveal which temporal regions drive the final prediction, while also yielding richer, context-aware representations of each segment. We evaluate the proposed approach on two publicly available datasets, MEED and DIEM-A, and compare it against a standalone Transformer baseline under different batch size and window configuration settings. The Window Transformer consistently outperforms the baseline and exhibits a more stable behavior across training configurations, achieving best accuracies of 56.35 ± 2.67% on MEED and 23.84 ± 0.83% on DIEM-A in a subject-independent scenario. Beyond performance gains, this work also establishes new benchmark values on both datasets, providing reference results that future research on bodily emotion recognition can build on.

Indexed as

affective computingbody motionemotion recognitionmultiple instance learningtransformers

Identifiers

PMID42625832
PMCPMC13490061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.