ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Emotion recognition from body movement through interpretable motion-aware sequential modeling.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion recognition from bodily movement remains a challenging problem, particularly when only pose-based motion sequences are available and emotionally informative content is not uniformly distributed across time. In this work, we propose a Window Transformer architecture grounded in the Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) paradigm to address this challenge. Rather than processing the full sequence as a single temporal stream, the model decomposes it into overlapping windows and learns to assign greater relevance to those segments containing stronger emotional content. This formulation provides a more interpretable framework, since the learned relevance scores reveal which temporal regions drive the final prediction, while also yielding richer, context-aware representations of each segment. We evaluate the proposed approach on two publicly available datasets, MEED and DIEM-A, and compare it against a standalone Transformer baseline under different batch size and window configuration settings. The Window Transformer consistently outperforms the baseline and exhibits a more stable behavior across training configurations, achieving best accuracies of 56.35 ± 2.67% on MEED and 23.84 ± 0.83% on DIEM-A in a subject-independent scenario. Beyond performance gains, this work also establishes new benchmark values on both datasets, providing reference results that future research on bodily emotion recognition can build on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.