ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
A survey of transformer-based architectures in medical image analysis: models, applications, and challenges.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transformer-based architectures have become central to medical image analysis, yet their practical value remains difficult to assess because studies vary widely in tasks, datasets, validation protocols, baselines, and reporting quality. This survey critically reviews recent transformer-based, hybrid, foundation, and transformer-alternative models across segmentation, classification, reconstruction, and image registration. A total of 128 studies published between 2021 and 2026 are organized using a task-, modality-, and architecture-aware taxonomy, with reported performance synthesized alongside baseline comparisons, reproducibility, computational cost, and clinical-readiness evidence. The findings indicate that the most convincing gains arise from task-adapted hybrid designs that combine local feature extraction with global context modeling, rather than from an unconditional superiority of transformers over convolutional networks. Persistent gaps include non-standardized benchmarks, limited external validation, incomplete code and weight availability, inconsistent efficiency reporting, weak uncertainty analysis, and insufficient clinical evaluation. Progress will require transparent reporting, multicenter validation, and clinically grounded assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.