SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Transdiagnostic effects of combined sleep-circadian interventions on depressive symptoms and sleep outcomes in adults with mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Sleep disturbance and circadian rhythm dysregulation are common in mental disorders and may contribute to depressive symptoms and functional impairment. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of non-pharmacological interventions targeting sleep and circadian rhythms on depressive symptoms and sleep-related outcomes in adults experiencing mental disorders. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang, covering the period from their inception until April 12, 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with clinically diagnosed mental disorders receiving combined sleep-circadian interventions. The included populations covered depressive disorders, bipolar disorder, severe mental illness, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and mixed psychiatric samples. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses were carried out with the aid of Review Manager version 5.4. Depending on the context, standardized mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs), or risk ratios (RRs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Results: Eleven RCTs were included. Sleep-circadian interventions were associated with reduced depressive symptom severity (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.30) and higher treatment response (RR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.27). Remission also favored the intervention groups, but this estimate was based on only two trials (RR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.09 to 3.90). Improvements were observed in insomnia severity (MD = -5.23, 95% CI: -6.41 to -4.04), sleep disturbance or sleep quality (SMD = -0.92, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.65), sleep-related impairment (MD = -7.91, 95% CI: -9.89 to -5.93), and functional impairment (MD = -4.78, 95% CI: -6.42 to -3.15). Evidence certainty ranged from very low to moderate, and several outcomes were supported by few trials. Conclusion: Sleep-circadian interventions may improve depressive symptoms, selected sleep outcomes, and functioning in adults with mental disorders. Given the heterogeneity of diagnoses and interventions, these findings should be viewed as promising transdiagnostic evidence. Larger trials with longer follow-up are needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD420261412965.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.