ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Penicillin allergy documentation in the UAE: 10-year trends and stewardship implications.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Penicillin allergy labels are frequently documented in electronic medical records (EMRs), although most patients are not truly allergic upon formal evaluation. Inaccurate allergy labels result in unnecessary avoidance of first-line beta-lactam antibiotics, increased use of broad-spectrum alternatives, and contribute to antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections. Data describing allergy-label documentation and de-labelling practices in the United Arab Emirates remain limited. Methods: This retrospective study examined temporal trends, documentation quality, and de-labelling patterns of penicillin and other beta-lactam allergy labels in EMRs from two tertiary care centres in Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, between 2015 and 2025. Extracted variables included age, sex, allergen class, adverse reaction type, reaction severity, duration of the documented allergy record, and de-labelling status. Results: A total of 35,134 penicillin allergy records and 6,317 other beta-lactam allergy records were identified. Adults and females accounted for most documented allergy labels. Documentation quality was suboptimal, with adverse reaction type and severity missing from the majority of records. De-labelling rates were higher for penicillin than for other beta-lactams but declined over time, decreasing from 16% in 2015 to approximately 10% in 2025. The annual proportion of documented penicillin allergy labels reached its lowest level in 2020 before increasing thereafter, whereas the proportion of other beta-lactam allergy labels remained relatively stable. De-labelling was more frequent among records documented for less than one year and among those classified as mild or involving cutaneous or gastrointestinal reactions, and less frequent among records documented for more than five years or classified as severe. Allergy-record duration reflected the time since first EMR documentation rather than the time since the original allergic reaction. Discussion: These findings demonstrate important gaps in allergy documentation and the persistence of incompletely characterized beta-lactam allergy labels within EMRs. Standardized documentation and structured, risk-stratified de-labelling strategies should be prioritized as part of antimicrobial stewardship programs to optimize beta-lactam utilization and help mitigate antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.