ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Mechanotransduction and cell fate: from molecular sensors to multicellular self-organization.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical signals are now recognized as instructive cues that guide cell fate decisions with a precision comparable to classical morphogens. The identification of genetically encoded mechanosensors-including the PIEZO and TMC ion channel families, Transient Receptor Potential channels, and mechanosensitive adhesion complexes-has revealed how cells translate forces into transcriptional programs. In this review we integrate three levels of mechanotransduction biology: the molecular sensors that detect force, the intracellular signaling networks that convert sensing into gene expression, and the multicellular dynamics by which local mechanical interactions drive tissue self-organization. We discuss how substrate stiffness, applied tension, and cell-cell mechanical coupling regulates the differentiation of stem and progenitor cells across diverse lineages, with particular emphasis on the developing cardiovascular system as a paradigmatic mechanobiological organ: primitive blood flow instructs cardiac chamber morphogenesis, and mechanosensitive channels such as PIEZO1 are essential for vascular patterning. We also examine skeletal progenitor commitment and articulate an emerging conceptual distinction-the Regeneration-Specific Mechanosensor hypothesis-proposing that a defined subset of mechanosensors is dispensable during morphogenesis but becomes essential during tissue repair, with TRPA1 as the prototypical example. Structural and computational insights into channel gating, together with engineered mechanical environments for directing stem cell fate, provide a translational bridge toward regenerative therapeutics in cardiovascular and musculoskeletal medicine. Outstanding questions include the hierarchy of mechanosensors during lineage commitment, the mechanical logic of multicellular symmetry breaking, and the translational potential of regeneration-specific mechanosensitive drug targets. We propose that integrating molecular, cellular, and tissue-scale mechanobiology offers a unifying framework for understanding cell fate decisions in both development and regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.