Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Implementing shared decision-making for hospitalized patients with schizophrenia: a qualitative study of nurse and patient perspectives.

Bin Xu, Yanxia Guo, Yan Han, Xiaofang Lin, Miaomiao Li, Lili Wu, Xueyuan Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bin Xu *Huai'an Third People's Hospital, Huaian, China.
Yanxia Guo *School of Nursing and Midwifery, Jiangsu College of Nursing, Huaian, China.
Yan HanHuai'an Third People's Hospital, Huaian, China.
Xiaofang LinHuai'an Third People's Hospital, Huaian, China.
Miaomiao LiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Jiangsu College of Nursing, Huaian, China.
Lili WuHuai'an Third People's Hospital, Huaian, China.
Xueyuan HouHuai'an Third People's Hospital, Huaian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is fundamental to person-centered psychiatry, yet its implementation in schizophrenia care remains limited and poorly understood. Existing research predominantly examines SDM from either healthcare provider or patient perspectives, overlooking the integrated perspectives from both sides within clinical settings. Objective: To explore shared decision-making experiences in inpatient schizophrenia care from the integrated perspectives of nurses and patients on the same clinical unit. Methods: A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted in a tertiary psychiatric hospital in Jiangsu Province, China. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 psychiatric nurses and 12 inpatients with schizophrenia between April and December 2024. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological analysis framework. Results: Both nurses and patients recognized the value of SDM, yet implementation encountered multidimensional barriers. Four interconnected themes emerged (1): Perceptions of SDM and role positioning-nurses recognized the value of SDM and assumed multiple facilitator roles, while patients' perceived capacity for participation fluctuated with clinical status, requiring dynamic assessment and progressive engagement; (2) Attitudes and trust relationships influencing SDM implementation-nurses displayed diverse attitudes ranging from proactive support to explicit opposition, while trust between clinicians and patients was identified as the cornerstone of effective SDM; (3) Practical challenges in SDM implementation-clinical and ethical complexities, compounded by ineffective information communication, created significant barriers to SDM; and (4) Internal and external support systems affecting SDM-family involvement exerted dual influences of facilitation and paternalistic substitution, while pervasive social stigma further hindered patient participation. Conclusions: Implementing SDM in schizophrenia care is a systematic endeavor shaped by the interplay of conceptual, relational, communicative, and contextual factors. Advancing patient-centered psychiatry requires a dual transformation: empowering nurses as skilled facilitators while actively activating patients as central participants, supported by trust-based relationships, tailored information tools, and integrated family-social resources.

Indexed as

nurse-patient relationsperson-centered carepsychiatric nursingqualitative researchschizophreniashared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42625766
PMCPMC13490086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.