ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Mitochondrial genome of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Plant mitochondrial genomes exhibit remarkable structural complexity and play important roles in environmental adaptation. To investigate the evolutionary dynamics of alpine plants, this study assembled and characterized the complete mitochondrial genome of Methods: Using PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing data, the mitochondrial genome of Results: The complete mitochondrial genome was 297,265 bp in length, with a GC content of 44.71%, and contained 34 protein-coding genes, 20 tRNA genes, and 3 rRNA genes. A total of 271 repetitive sequences were identified, indicating substantial structural plasticity in the mitochondrial genome. Chloroplast-derived fragments accounted for 1.68% of the genome and were mainly distributed in non-coding regions. A total of 572 RNA editing sites were predicted, all of which resulted in non-synonymous amino acid substitutions. Codon usage bias was relatively weak and appeared to be primarily driven by natural selection. Ka/Ks analysis indicated that most genes evolved under purifying selection, whereas Conclusions: This study provides the first complete mitochondrial genome report for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.