Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625723›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

What shapes mathematics anxiety in K-12 education? A scoping review of research from 2019 to 2025.

Yu Zhou, Bin Jing, Qin Wang, Jing Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu ZhouFaculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Bin JingFaculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Qin WangFaculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jing ZhangXinjiang Basic Education Quality Improvement Research Center, Changji University, Changji, Xinjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite growing interest in mathematics anxiety, comprehensive syntheses of recent K-12 research remain limited. This scoping review aims to map the literature on mathematics anxiety that was published between January 2019 and December 2025. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this review analyzed 132 empirical studies. The analysis categorized influencing factors into antecedents, processes, and outcomes, while also examining methodological characteristics and interventions. Results: Findings indicate that antecedent factors comprise individual (e.g., gender, grade) and environmental influences (e.g., parents, teachers, peers, culture), though research on high school students and cross-national comparisons remains notably underdeveloped. Process factors encompass behavioral, cognitive, and emotional dimensions, with cognitive aspects dominating the literature. Mathematics performance persists as the primary outcome of concern. Methodologically, studies rely heavily on variable-centered, cross-sectional designs, with limited use of person-centered, longitudinal, or multimodal approaches. Interventions predominantly target either contextual restructuring (e.g., peer tutoring, game design, mathematical software) or strategy training (e.g., skill enhancement, emotional regulation). Discussion: These findings highlight the need for integrated systemic models and methodological pluralism. Effective interventions must pair anxiety-reducing classrooms with self-regulation training, with particular urgency for high school students facing critical transitions.

Indexed as

influencing factorsinterventionsK-12 educationmathematics anxietymethodological characteristics

Identifiers

PMID42625723
PMCPMC13490170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.