ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Perceptions and interest in applied educational neuroscience: a diagnostic study of Brazilian teachers.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of educational neuroscience into teacher professional development may support evidence-informed practice, but little is known about Brazilian educators' perceptions of their own knowledge, interests, and their preferred training formats. In this cross-sectional exploratory study, 204 active educators recruited through professional networks and social media completed an online survey. The instrument assessed self-perceived knowledge and interest across ten neuroscience-related topics and preferences for six training formats. Differences in self-perceived knowledge were observed across gender and teaching level; female educators reported greater interest in learning about the Child's brain, and educators in higher levels reported knowing more than educators in other levels regarding Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking, as well as Neurodevelopment and Brain Plasticity. Training-format preferences also varied across groups. Building on previous work from our group that tested neuroscience knowledge and neuromyth endorsement in over 2,700 Brazilian participants, these new findings describe perceived competence and learning preferences in a group of educators from different areas that may inform the development of targeted training materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.