ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A simple-to-use clinical nomogram to predict radiation esophagitis among esophageal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Moderate-to-severe acute radiation esophagitis (MSARE) is a treatment-limiting toxicity of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) in esophageal cancer (EC). Early identification of high-risk patients is essential to individualize supportive care and preserve treatment continuity. Purpose: To develop and internally validate a parsimonious clinical nomogram for predicting MSARE, interpret it with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and benchmark it against four machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 151 EC patients who completed thoracic RT between January 2022 and December 2024. Candidate predictors were screened with LASSO regression and entered into a multivariable logistic model, visualized as a nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, clinical utility, and learning behavior were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and a learning curve. Logistic regression was benchmarked against XGBoost, LightGBM, AdaBoost, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) under stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Results: MSARE occurred in 81 of 151 patients (53.6%). Three independent predictors were retained: upper esophageal tumor (OR 7.32), hypertension (OR 2.35), and serum albumin (OR 0.85; all P < 0.05). The nomogram achieved a 5-fold cross-validated training AUC of 0.832 and validation AUC of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.676-0.949), with good calibration ( Conclusions: An interpretable three-variable nomogram demonstrates promising internal discrimination for MSARE, yields comparable performance to four ML algorithms, and supports individualized supportive-care planning by clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.