Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625612›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Knowledge of cervical cancer screening, barriers to awareness, and the role of technological interventions in improving screening uptake: a scoping review protocol.

Slindile Zondi, Mabina Mogale, Elizabeth Khalongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Slindile ZondiDepartment of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mabina MogaleDepartment of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.
Elizabeth KhalongoDepartment of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer remains a major public health concern despite being largely preventable through early detection, regular screening, timely diagnosis, and effective treatment of precancerous lesions. Globally, cervical cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where access to preventive services remains limited. Although screening guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the South African Department of Health (DOH) are widely available, inadequate knowledge and poor dissemination of information to women continue to hinder participation in screening programmes. In South Africa, studies have highlighted inconsistencies and ineffective health education related to cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment, resulting in low screening uptake and delayed healthcare-seeking behaviour. The lack of structured cervical cancer education within public healthcare settings contributes to delayed diagnosis, increased mortality, higher healthcare costs, and psychological distress among affected women. In response, technological interventions such as reminder systems, callback mechanisms, mass media campaigns, mobile health (mHealth) programmes, and digital health strategies have been recommended to improve awareness, knowledge, and screening uptake among women. Methods and analysis: The development of this protocol follows the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley for conducting scoping reviews, with enhancements recommended by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The review selection process will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to ensure methodological transparency and reproducibility. Rayyan will be used to facilitate the screening process and identify duplicate records during study selection. The population of interest will include women eligible for cervical cancer screening irrespective of age, with particular attention to adolescents, older women, rural residents, underserved populations, and healthcare providers where relevant. The review will focus on knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer, barriers to screening participation, and technological interventions including mHealth, SMS-based systems, telemedicine, and digital health platforms aimed at improving screening uptake and health education. Searches will be conducted on the Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify relevant literature. A two-stage screening process involving title/abstract screening followed by full-text review will be used to determine study eligibility, and data will be extracted using a standardized data-charting form. Clinical Trial Registration: https://osf.io/4ms7w.

Indexed as

cervical cancer screeningdigital health interventionshealth awarenessscoping reviewscreening uptake

Identifiers

PMID42625612
PMCPMC13489826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.