ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Machine learning models for risk prediction of diabetic retinopathy in Fujian eye study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is among the most severe microvascular complications of diabetes, leading to visual impairment and diminished quality of life. This study developed and compared multiple machine learning models for DR risk prediction using population-based data from the Fujian Eye Study, aiming to identify the top five key predictors and establish a robust data-driven framework for early screening. Methods: Data were obtained from the Fujian Eye Study, comprising 8211 participants and 51 variables. After data preprocessing, five machine learning models-Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF)- were trained and optimized via cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. Feature importance was examined using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) and validated through unsupervised and nonparametric approaches-Factor Analysis (FA), Highly Variable Feature Selection (HVGS), and Spearman's rank correlation. Results: Among the five models, SVC model achieved the highest performance (F1-score 92.83%, AUC 0.99). SHAP analysis identified the top five predictors of DR risk: history of diabetes, age, pulse pressure difference (PPG), near visual acuity of the left eye, and height. Cross-method comparison confirmed high feature stability across models, indicating robust predictor reproducibility. Conclusion: This study successfully established and validated a machine learning-based framework for predicting diabetic retinopathy risk using data from the Fujian Eye Study. The support vector machine (SVC) model demonstrated superior predictive capability. The identified key risk factors-diabetes history, age, pulse pressure difference, left eye near visual acuity, and height-provide actionable insights for early stratification. These findings provide a reliable, data-driven tool for early DR screening, which can facilitate population-level risk stratification and inform personalized preventive interventions in clinical and public health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.