ArticleEpilepsia open2026
DECREASE study: A European pool-analysis of patients with significant reductions in concomitant antiseizure medications in cenobamate Early Access Programs.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of cenobamate in patients with a significant reduction in concomitant antiseizure medication (ASM) in European cenobamate Early Access Programs (EAPs).
methodAnonymized patient data from real-world studies/registries associated with European cenobamate EAPs were pooled. Patients were included if they had significantly reduced their concomitant drug load (i.e., converted to cenobamate monotherapy or reduced from multiple to one concomitant ASM) between baseline and the last visit. Effectiveness, tolerability, and dosage of cenobamate were evaluated. Responses according to therapeutic regimen at last visit were studied.
resultsOf 694 patients within cenobamate EAPs, 75 (10.7%) met the inclusion criteria (mean age 39.5 years [range 19-65]). At baseline, the median number of prior ASMs was 10 (interquartile range [IQR] 6-13); 46 patients (61.3%) were taking two, 23 (30.7%) were taking three, and six (8%) were taking four concomitant ASMs at baseline. At the last visit, seven patients (9.3%) were converted to monotherapy and 68 (90.7%) were receiving one concomitant ASM. The median cenobamate dosage at last visit was 300 mg (IQR 200-350). Median cenobamate follow-up was 22 months; 73 patients (97%) had at least 1 year of follow-up and one discontinued cenobamate at 1 year. Twenty-five patients (33.3%) were seizure-free at last visit; 51 (68%) had a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. The seizure-freedom rate was numerically, but not significantly, higher in patients converted to monotherapy (57.1%) versus those receiving one concomitant ASM (30.9%; p = 0.16). Cenobamate plus clobazam was the most effective combination. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 55/75 patients (73.3%); the most common were somnolence (30.7%), dizziness/vertigo (28%), and fatigue (26.7%). No AEs led to treatment discontinuation. SIGNIFICANCE: Cenobamate demonstrated good effectiveness and tolerability in a population of patients within European EAPs who achieved a significant reduction of concomitant ASM. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: People with highly drug-resistant epilepsy often need to take several antiseizure medications at the same time. Combined data from European Early Access Programs show that about 10% of people treated with cenobamate were able to stop all other antiseizure medications or reduce treatment to cenobamate plus one other medication. Despite this simplification of treatment, one-third of these patients became seizure-free and more than two-thirds experienced at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Within this group, no patients stopped cenobamate because of side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.