ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2026
Twenty-Four-Hour Blood Pressure Variability Combined With Circadian Rhythm Patterns in Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-term blood pressure variability (BPV) and circadian BP abnormalities are important cardiovascular risk predictors of mean BP levels, but their combined prognostic significance in essential hypertension remains incompletely understood. To evaluate the independent and combined prognostic value of 24-hour BPV and circadian BP patterns for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with essential hypertension. This retrospective cohort study included 500 adults with essential hypertension who underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Short-term BPV was assessed using the standard deviation of 24-hour systolic BP. Circadian patterns were classified as dipper, non-dipper, or reverse dipper based on nighttime systolic BP decline. The primary outcome was MACE, including myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate associations with outcomes. During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 128 patients (25.6%) experienced MACE. High BPV was associated with a significantly greater incidence of MACE than low BPV (34.2% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001) and remained an independent predictor (adjusted HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.32-2.71, p < 0.001). Reverse dipping was also associated with increased risk. Patients with both elevated BPV and abnormal circadian patterns had the highest risk. Elevated short-term BPV and abnormal circadian BP patterns are independent predictors of MACE in essential hypertension. Their coexistence identifies a particularly high-risk phenotype. ABPM-based dynamic BP assessment may improve cardiovascular risk stratification beyond mean BP levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.