ReviewPediatric pulmonology2026
Pediatric Mild Asthma: Bridging Current Gaps to Improve Future Care.
Review in Pediatric pulmonology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric mild asthma is considered a benign condition, yet it accounts for a substantial proportion of morbidity. Characterization and management of children or adolescents with mild asthma are less explored than in adults, particularly due to its heterogeneous nature and variable course. Current definitions of mild asthma in pediatric populations vary across international guidelines or reports, limiting standardization. Although knowledge of asthma phenotypes and endotypes, and risk biomarkers has progressed notably, it is incomplete in the different pediatric age groups exhibiting mild or intermittent symptoms. Moreover, differing treatment recommendations may lead to uncertainty in clinical practice on whether using short-acting β
methodsIn this narrative review, we integrated evidence and recommendations from major asthma guidelines and reports complemented by selected insights from recent literature not addressed in these sources.
resultsWe summarized the current knowledge of pediatric mild asthma, risk factors for exacerbation, treatment recommendations, and highlighted gaps in clinical practice or questions still unanswered.
conclusionsIn children and adolescents, asthma may seem only apparently mild, mainly due to overlooked or poorly controlled exacerbations. A more unified approach would improve clinical outcomes and reduce its global burden. Priorities include a standardized definition of the mild asthma phenotype in children and adolescents, a detailed examination of risk factors as early predictors of poor outcomes and of the limited access to medications and healthcare resources in low-income countries. Incorporating a broader global health perspective would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the care of children with mild asthma worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.