Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625446›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2026

A Tiered Genetic Diagnostic Approach in Newborns With Major Congenital Anomalies: Experience From a Tertiary NICU.

Hatice Mutlu, Ece Eker, Yasemin Ezgi Köstekci, Ferhan Demirtaş, Doğan Kaymaz, Muhammed Doğukan Kalenderoğlu, Arzu Ay, Şule Altıner, Emel Okulu, Ömer Erdeve and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hatice MutluDepartment of Pediatric Genetics, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-3878
Ece EkerDepartment of Pediatric Genetics, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-6007
Yasemin Ezgi KöstekciDepartment of Neonatology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-3128
Ferhan DemirtaşDepartment of Neonatology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7482-8175
Doğan KaymazDepartment of Neonatology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0583-0890
Muhammed Doğukan KalenderoğluDepartment of Pediatric Genetics, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-5193
Arzu AyDepartment of Pediatric Genetics, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-7554
Şule AltınerDepartment of Medical Genetics, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-8630
Emel OkuluDepartment of Neonatology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-3355
Ömer ErdeveDepartment of Neonatology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-0812
Begüm AtasayDepartment of Neonatology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-5293
Saadet ArsanDepartment of Neonatology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-7702

Funding

2023-2816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor congenital anomalies (MCAs) are a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality and frequently reflect underlying chromosomal, copy number, or single-gene defects. In neonates with multiple MCAs, early molecular diagnosis is critical but remains challenging due to phenotypic heterogeneity, overlapping developmental pathways, and limitations in selecting the most appropriate genetic test.

methodsThis prospective study included 146 neonates with congenital anomalies who were referred for genetic consultation from a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit between April 2022 and May 2025. A major congenital anomaly was defined as a structural abnormality present at birth with significant medical, functional, or cosmetic consequences, while multiple congenital anomalies were defined as two or more major anomalies involving different organ systems. Clinical features were systematically annotated using Human Phenotype Ontology terms and classified according to organ system and embryological origin. A tiered diagnostic strategy was applied, including conventional cytogenetic analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), whole-exome sequencing (WES), and rapid-WES (rWES) in selected critically ill neonates.

resultsCardiovascular anomalies were the most frequent (45.9%), and 88 of 146 neonates (60.3%) had two or more MCAs. Cytogenetic testing identified numerical chromosomal abnormalities in eight neonates. CMA detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants in 6 of 65 tested cases (9.1%). In CMA-negative patients, WES achieved a diagnostic yield of 41.4%, identifying variants in genes involved in multisystem developmental pathways. Rapid WES established definitive molecular diagnoses in two of three critically ill neonates within 72 h, directly influencing clinical management. Embryological analysis revealed recurrent co-occurrence patterns, particularly cardiovascular-craniofacial and cardiovascular-genitourinary associations.

conclusionA structured, tiered genomic approach enhances diagnostic yield in neonates with congenital anomalies. Integration of cytogenetics, CMA, and CNV-aware exome sequencing provides a pragmatic and clinically actionable framework for molecular diagnosis in NICU settings and supports developmentally informed interpretation of complex phenotypes.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesGenetic TestingAbnormalities, MultipleChromosome AberrationsCytogenetic AnalysisDNA Copy Number VariationsExome SequencingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleProspective StudiesTertiary Care Centerschromosomal microarraymajor congenital anomaliesneonatal intensive care unitrapid genomic diagnosiswhole‐exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42625446
PMCPMC13494563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.