Trial reportPhysiological reports2026
Effects of short-term hand immobilization on motor functions across domains in adults.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Short-term limb immobilization is known to impair muscle strength; however, its effects across distinct domains of motor function remain incompletely characterized. In this study, we assessed the effects of 72-h of hand immobilization on motor functions in healthy adults. Twenty-eight participants were randomized to an immobilization or control group and completed a motor test battery before and after the intervention. The battery assessed maximal and explosive strength, quantified as maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force and rate of force development (RFD), fatigability during sustained maximal contractions, force steadiness during submaximal contractions, and manual dexterity. Immobilization induced domain-specific impairments in motor performance. MVC force and RFD declined significantly following immobilization, indicating susceptibility of maximal and explosive strength to short-term disuse. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the selected parameters of fatigability during sustained maximal contractions, including the fatigue time constant and plateau force. Force steadiness showed a selective increase in relative force variability, whereas absolute force variability remained unchanged. Manual dexterity was not reduced from baseline, but immobilization attenuated the test-retest performance improvements observed in the control group and contralateral non-immobilized hand. These findings demonstrate that hand immobilization induces task- and domain-specific alterations in motor performance rather than a uniform decline, preferentially affecting motor domains that require high force production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.