Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625364›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2026

Sucrose and pipecolic acid-mediated enrichment of rhizosphere Rhizobiale-Burkholderiale bacteria improves soybean growth under low-light conditions.

Dongmei Li, Chunting Zhang, Wenqian Wang, Luming Ma, Yaru Huang, Liang Liu, Jinshui Yang, Entao Wang, Feng Jiang, Hongli Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dongmei LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Chunting ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Wenqian WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Heze Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Heze, Shandong 274000, China.
Luming MaState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yaru HuangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Liang LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Jinshui YangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Entao WangDepartamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.
Feng JiangCollege of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: jiangfeng@cau.edu.cn.
Hongli YuanState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: hlyuan@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low light (LL) limits the productivity of intercropped and densely planted legumes and also affects root-associated microbial communities. However, how LL reshapes root-microbe interactions and whether the root microbiota can mitigate LL-induced damage in legumes remain unclear. Here, a meta-analysis based on field observations revealed that negative effects predominated (>70%) in intercropped and densely planted legume systems, with light intensity emerging as the strongest predictor of yield variation. Using soybean as a model, we found that LL suppressed photosynthesis, biomass accumulation, and nodulation and that these effects were further aggravated in sterilized soil. Furthermore, soil transplantation experiments showed that soils conditioned by LL-grown plants reduced subsequent plant biomass. Compared with normal light, LL shifted rhizosphere microbial assembly toward a more deterministic process, reduced bacterial diversity, and simplified bacterial co-occurrence networks, with Rhizobiales and Burkholderiales showing significantly lower relative abundances. Metabolomic analysis identified sucrose and pipecolic acid as LL-responsive metabolites whose abundances were strongly correlated with the relative abundances of these taxa. Chemotaxis and growth assays revealed that sucrose functions as both a carbon source and a chemoattractant, whereas pipecolic acid acts as a chemoattractant. Reintroduction of representative isolates or simplified synthetic microbial communities alleviated LL-induced growth inhibition by enhancing photosynthetic performance, modulating redox status, and reprogramming host transcriptional responses. Together, our findings support a model linking root exudates, rhizosphere microbiota, and plant performance under LL and highlight the potential of microbiome-based strategies to improve crop production in LL environments.

Indexed as

Glycine maxLightPipecolic AcidsRhizosphereSucroseMicrobiotaPlant RootsSoil Microbiologypipecolic acidPipecolic AcidsSucroselow-light stressrhizosphere microbiotaroot exudatessoybean

Identifiers

PMID42625364
PMCPMC13681574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.