ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Variation in antenatal anaemia guidelines across the NHS in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional study.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antenatal anaemia affects up to 30% of pregnant women in the United Kingdom and is a recognised clinical priority. National management guidance is published by the British Society of Haematology (BSH), but the extent to which local National Health Service (NHS) guidelines align with it is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional document analysis of antenatal anaemia guidelines from 49 NHS sites across the United Kingdom, obtained through two national research programmes. Two reviewers independently extracted data on screening, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, using the 2020 BSH guideline as the national reference standard. The included guidelines represented approximately 33% of annual UK births. Screening and diagnostic haemoglobin thresholds were broadly consistent with BSH guidance, whereas substantial variation was concentrated in treatment and monitoring: oral iron indications, dosing and duration; haemoglobin thresholds and clinical criteria for intravenous iron; and the timing, biomarkers and response definitions used after treatment. Ferritin thresholds, reassessment intervals and response criteria were frequently absent or divergent. Variation was greatest in domains where the underlying evidence base is least resolved. These findings characterise the nature and extent of guideline-level variation across NHS maternity care and identify priority areas for future research and national guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.