Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625347›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026

Variation in antenatal anaemia guidelines across the NHS in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional study.

Sarah Haynes, Islam Balboula, Peter Collins, William Parry-Smith, Haddy Fye, Amy Elsmore, Rachel Collis, Lucy De Lloyd, David Churchill, Sarah F Bell and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah HaynesNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8605-6263
Islam BalboulaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Peter CollinsInstitute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
William Parry-SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Haddy FyePatient and Public Involvement and Engagement Representative, OBS-UK Trial, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5597-3975
Amy ElsmoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-4266
Rachel CollisDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Lucy De LloydDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-3260
David ChurchillDepartment of Obstetrics, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-2953
Sarah F BellDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-1360
Simon J StanworthDepartment of Haematology, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7414-4950

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research HSDR-NIHR 152057National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR RP-PG-NIHR200869Rhodes Scholarships
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antenatal anaemia affects up to 30% of pregnant women in the United Kingdom and is a recognised clinical priority. National management guidance is published by the British Society of Haematology (BSH), but the extent to which local National Health Service (NHS) guidelines align with it is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional document analysis of antenatal anaemia guidelines from 49 NHS sites across the United Kingdom, obtained through two national research programmes. Two reviewers independently extracted data on screening, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, using the 2020 BSH guideline as the national reference standard. The included guidelines represented approximately 33% of annual UK births. Screening and diagnostic haemoglobin thresholds were broadly consistent with BSH guidance, whereas substantial variation was concentrated in treatment and monitoring: oral iron indications, dosing and duration; haemoglobin thresholds and clinical criteria for intravenous iron; and the timing, biomarkers and response definitions used after treatment. Ferritin thresholds, reassessment intervals and response criteria were frequently absent or divergent. Variation was greatest in domains where the underlying evidence base is least resolved. These findings characterise the nature and extent of guideline-level variation across NHS maternity care and identify priority areas for future research and national guideline development.

Indexed as

AnemiaPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancy Complications, HematologicPrenatal CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIronPregnancyState MedicineUnited KingdomIronanaemiaantenatalguidelinesiron deficiencyNHSpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42625347
PMCPMC13570162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.