ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Estimated pulse wave velocity as an integrated hemodynamic risk indicator in obese women with gestational hypertension: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with increased cardiovascular risk and arterial remodeling, further complicated by obesity. While carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity remains the gold standard for arterial stiffness assessment, estimated PWV (ePWV) and carotid-radial PWV (crPWV) offer practical alternatives. This study evaluated ePWV and crPWV in gestational hypertension (GH) and their association with asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). Cross-sectional analysis of 74 obese pregnant women (GH: n = 38; normotensive: n = 36). Lifestyle characteristics were assessed via WHO STEPS questionnaire. Seated blood pressure was measured and ePWV calculated. crPWV and augmentation index (AIx) were assessed using Complior Analyse. Serum ADMA was measured. Multivariable linear regression identified independent predictors of arterial stiffness, adjusting for central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), AIx, ADMA, and GH status. ePWV was significantly higher in the GH group (7.7 vs. 6.6 m/s; p < 0.001), while crPWV did not differ significantly (p = 0.14). A significant correlation between ePWV and crPWV was observed (r = 0.42; p < 0.001). ADMA did not differ between groups. cSBP and AIx independently predicted crPWV; GH status independently predicted ePWV. ADMA was not significantly associated with either marker. ePWV may serve as a practical, effective index for assessing vascular load in obese obstetric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.