ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2026
Supported Decision-Making Inventory: Psychometric Validation of the Catalan and Spanish Versions.
Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupported decision-making is central to rights-based practice, but psychometric evidence in Catalan and Spanish is limited.
methodsThe Supported Decision Making Inventory (SDMI) was translated and adapted for use in Catalan and Spanish. Content validity, internal structure, reliability, measurement invariance and construct-related evidence were examined in 510 adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities receiving services from providers in Catalonia.
resultsExpert ratings provided content validity evidence. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the six-factor model (CFI = 0.925, TLI = 0.916, RMSEA = 0.055 and SRMR = 0.055) and scalar invariance across interview language. Reliability evidence varied across domains and subscales, with stronger estimates for environmental demands and decision-making supports than for personal factors. Construct-related evidence was stronger for environmental demands and decision-making supports than for personal factors.
conclusionsFindings support interpreting Catalan and Spanish SDMI scores at domain and subscale levels to assess supported decision-making and inform support planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.