ReviewJournal of clinical apheresis2026
Apheresis Medicine as a Multidisciplinary Subspecialty: International Models for Training, Quality, and Professional Societies.
Review in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apheresis medicine comprises a group of extracorporeal therapies essential for the management of hematologic, renal, neurologic, immunologic, transplant-related, oncologic, and critical care conditions. Advances in technology, expansion of evidence-based indications, and integration into multidisciplinary care pathways have transformed apheresis from a technical service into a clinically complex subspecialty. We conducted a narrative review of published literature and international society documentation describing models for apheresis training, professional societies, quality assurance, and regulatory interaction across high-income and resource-limited settings. Sources included peer-reviewed literature, international society guidelines, and policy documents published primarily between 2010 and 2026. Professional apheresis societies have emerged internationally to support education, quality assurance, guideline development, and workforce competency, frequently in collaboration with regulatory authorities. These societies function as scientific and educational bodies complementary to, rather than substitutive of, regulatory frameworks. Six core domains of society activity were identified: education and continuing professional development (CPD), quality and patient safety, guidelines and standards, workforce development, research and registries, and professional collaboration. Apheresis medicine has matured into a multidisciplinary clinical subspecialty requiring a dedicated professional infrastructure. International experience demonstrates that professional apheresis societies provide an evidence-based mechanism to advance education, quality assurance, and patient safety while complementing regulatory oversight. These models are generalizable across healthcare systems at varying stages of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.