ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Adulticide treatment with melarsomine: outcome in 283 heartworm-positive dogs in Germany.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeartworm disease is of increasing significance in Europe because of climate change and the movement of dogs from endemic regions. Despite guidelines from the American Heartworm Society (AHS) and the European Society of Dirofilariosis and Angiostrongylosis (ESDA), some clinicians favor macrocyclic lactones and doxycycline alone, partly because of concerns about melarsomine complications. Recent studies, however, support the safety and efficacy of the recommended protocol.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of dogs with Class I-III heartworm disease that underwent melarsomine adulticide treatment at a German referral center. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data, including adverse events, were systematically retrieved. Diagnosis was confirmed by antigen testing, with heat treatment applied when indicated. Therapy consisted of 28 days of doxycycline and monthly macrocyclic lactones, followed by a three-dose melarsomine protocol as recommended by AHS/ESDA. Supportive care included sedation, intravenous fluids, maropitant, and additional medications as clinically indicated.
resultsA total of 283 dogs were included. Median age was 4.2 years (range: 8 months-11.5 years), and median body weight was 19 (range: 3.4-51.1) kg. Females comprised 53% (84% spayed) and males 45% (89% neutered). All dogs originated from endemic European countries. Clinical signs before treatment included respiratory symptoms (31%), exercise intolerance (15%), gastrointestinal signs (8.5%), and others (2%), while 53% were asymptomatic. Complications following melarsomine were generally mild: injection-site soreness (9.2% after first, 2.1% after third injection), gastrointestinal signs (3.5% after first, 0.7% after third injection), and coughing (12.7% after first, 5.3% after third injection). Two dogs (0.7%) died during treatment, one from cardiac arrest under anesthesia and one from pancytopenia, but neither was conclusively attributable to melarsomine. At 6-month follow-up, none of the 221 dogs tested remained antigen positive.
conclusionsAdulticide treatment with melarsomine showed high efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Most adverse events were mild and self-limiting, with rare severe complications. These findings support the use of evidence-based, guideline-driven protocols to manage heartworm disease in dogs living in European countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.