ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Seroprevalence and molecular surveillance of Dirofilaria immitis in shelter dogs from central New Mexico, USA.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirofilaria immitis, the causative agent of canine heartworm disease, is a mosquito-borne filarial nematode, endemic to most of North America. Clinical signs may include coughing, exercise intolerance, abnormal heart sounds, and lethargy, which can lead to heart failure and death in severe cases. For accurate diagnosis, the American Heartworm Society (AHS) recommends testing dogs annually for the detection of heartworm antigens and microfilariae. In this study, we assessed the prevalence and potential risk factors for D. immitis in dogs from Albuquerque, New Mexico, using antigen and microfilariae detection tests.
methodsIn 2023, serum and whole-blood samples (n = 402) were collected from dogs in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as part of a larger study to detect Onchocerca lupi. Serum samples were screened for D. immitis using a commercially available antigen-detection ELISA (DiroCHEK
resultsSerum of 4 (0.99%) dogs tested antigen-positive pre-ICD, while 14 (3.47%) dogs tested antigen-positive post-ICD. We did not detect any positive dogs for D. immitis microfilariae by the probe-based qPCR. No risk factors were associated with the detection of the D. immitis antigen in this dog population.
conclusionsAlthough microfilariae were not detected in this study, it is possible that infections were in the early stages of disease progression, with D. immitis detected in pre- and post-ICD via antigen testing. Low seroprevalence and the absence of microfilariae DNA detected highlight the importance of using both pre- and post-ICD antigen detection alongside molecular-based microfilariae tests, particularly for companion animals living in low-endemic regions and for shelter populations that are less likely to be on heartworm prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.