ReviewParasites & vectors2026
The history of Wolbachia and heartworm.
Review in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wolbachia is the most widespread endosymbiont in animals, and its discovery in Dirofilaria immitis significantly advanced our understanding of heartworm disease (HWD). In 1995, Sironi and colleagues from the universities of Milan and Pavia, Italy, published a study titled "Molecular evidence for a close relative of the arthropod endosymbiont Wolbachia in a filarial worm" (Mol Biochem Parasitol. 74:223-7, 1995). In the 1970s, intracellular bacteria were observed in filarial nematodes by electron microscopy, but no one understood what they were or why they were there. There had been previous reports on the anti-filarial effects of tetracycline, but no connection with these bacteria had been made. Many years later, these bacteria were identified as belonging to the genus Wolbachia, marking a new chapter in filarial research. As soon as Wolbachia had been described in heartworms, there was a flurry of excitement in the scientific community. By 1999, Wolbachia had been described in a further nine species of animal and human filarial nematodes. Subsequent studies strongly suggested that Wolbachia are obligatory mutualist symbionts of D. immitis, and related research then focused on targeting Wolbachia in the treatment of HWD. Studies on the effects of doxycycline treatment in D. immitis-infected dogs reported that bacterial depletion in adult worms, elimination of microfilariae, and adult worm death were more effective when antibiotics were combined with macrocyclic lactones, and that use of this combination also avoided the deleterious post-adulticide effects of treatment with melarsomine. Dirofilaria immitis-infected dogs develop an immune response to Wolbachia, which likely contributes to the immunopathology of HWD. Insights into how D. immitis and Wolbachia interact were gained in 2012, when genome sequencing of these organisms was completed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.