Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625224›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Improved specificity of a probe-based real-time PCR for the detection of Dirofilaria immitis in canine blood.

Maureen A Kelly, Tiana L Sanders, Alexa Starnes, Emily Orr, Joe L Luksovsky, Caroline Sobotyk, Hassan Hakimi, Pabasara Weerarathne, Christine M Budke, Guilherme G Verocai

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maureen A KellyDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Tiana L SandersDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Alexa StarnesDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Emily OrrDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Joe L LuksovskyDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Caroline SobotykDepartment of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Hassan HakimiDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Pabasara WeerarathneDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Christine M BudkeDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Guilherme G VerocaiDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. gverocai@cvm.tamu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirofilaria immitis is a vector-borne filarioid nematode distributed worldwide and endemic across most of North America. In dogs, it is considered the most clinically significant parasite and a known cause of acquired cardiomyopathy. Clinically, canine heartworm disease can manifest acutely as caval syndrome and chronically as heart failure, often resulting in death. Different types of diagnostic tests, such as antigen-detection and microfilariae-detection tests (MFDTs), including modified Knott's test and molecular assays, may be used to diagnose D. immitis infection. Although some molecular tools, such as real-time PCR (qPCR), exhibit high accuracy, cross-reactivity with other Dirofilaria species found in companion animals remains a concern. Following our laboratory's previously published protocol, cross-reactivity was found with Dirofilaria striata isolated from a subcutaneous nodule of a cat from Texas. The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the performance of three newly designed probe-based qPCR assays for detecting D. immitis and (ii) assess overall detection with the newly designed protocols compared with the previously published protocol and other diagnostic tests.

methodsWe designed three new probes using accessioned D. immitis cytochrome c subunit 1 sequences from various countries worldwide to increase reliability. These new probes were then tested with genomic DNA extracted from D. immitis and D. striata. Following this, we further assessed the performance of these newly designed probes and previously developed probe using 136 archival shelter dog samples previously found to be positive for D. immitis by at least one diagnostic test.

resultsOut of the three probes tested, two (probe 2 and probe 3) specifically detected D. immitis and showed no cross-reactivity with D. striata. Probe 3 showed the highest prevalence of D. immitis among all qPCR assays (68.4%; n = 93/136 samples), followed by the original probe (66.9%; n = 91/136), with probe 2 (59.6%; n = 81/136) showing the lowest. Our analysis of agreement between probes using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistic indicated almost perfect agreement between probe 3 and the previously published probe (κ = 0.86). The shelter dog samples were also evaluated using other heartworm diagnostic methods, including the modified Knott's test, which was positive for 61.0% (n = 83/136) of the positive samples, and the previously published qPCR, which was positive for 66.9% (n = 91/136) of the samples. All samples were also tested in parallel with a commercially available antigen detection test (DiroCHEK®; Zoetis Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA), yielding 80.1% positivity pre-heat treatment (n = 109/136) and 94.9% post-heat treatment (n = 129/136). Probe 3 paired with post-heat treatment achieved the highest positivity of the molecular diagnostic tests (97.1%; n = 132/136).

conclusionsThis optimized probe-based qPCR assay (probe 3) provides an accurate and reliable method to detect D. immitis microfilariae in dogs and other carnivore hosts.

Indexed as

Dirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsDNA, HelminthDogsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, HelminthAntigen detectionCanine vector-borne diseasesDirofilaria immitisDogsHeartworm diseaseMicrofilariae detection testReal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID42625224
PMCPMC13491785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.