Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625221›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026

The impact of reward scalarization and weight scheduling on optimization dynamics in multi-objective molecular design.

Lucas Leuschner, Oscar Palomino-Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucas Leuschner *Department of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Duesbergweg 10-14, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Oscar Palomino-Hernandez *Department of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Duesbergweg 10-14, 55128, Mainz, Germany. opalomin@uni-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inverse molecular design imposes multiple property constraints, requiring them to be combined into a scalar reward for reinforcement-learning (RL) fine-tuning; a step that can be highly sensitive to the reward formulation. Here, we systematically analyze how scalarization choices and stabilization mechanisms shape optimization dynamics in RL fine-tuning for multi-parameter optimization (MPO). We evaluate three scalarization schemes (arithmetic mean, geometric mean, and Chebyshev) under multiple target regimes that vary in constraint tightness and prior support. While broad targets yield stable behavior across scalarizations, narrow and weakly supported targets expose sharp failure modes. We further show that these failure modes can be prevented through the usage of target-aware weight scheduling. Collectively, our results highlight critical interactions between scalarization choice and weight dynamics, and provide mechanistic insight and actionable guidance for stabilizing RL fine-tuning in constrained molecular MPO.Scientific contributionThis work examines different reward formulations in multi-objective reinforcement learning for molecular design, going beyond the designs typically considered in prior studies. We further show how these formulations influence convergence behavior and collapse modes, and how their effects depend on the size and constraint structure of the multi-dimensional optimization space.

Indexed as

De novo molecular generationDesirability functionsMolecular designMulti-objective optimizationReinforcement learning fine-tuningScalarization

Identifiers

PMID42625221
PMCPMC13491586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.