Observational studyBMC medicine2026
Microvascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction across the post-COVID-19 spectrum: a prospective observational case-control study.
Observational study in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05635552 (All Eyes on PCS - Analysis of the Retinal Microvasculature in Patients With Post-COVID-19 Syndrome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
All Eyes on PCS - Analysis of the Retinal Microvasculature in Patients With Post-COVID-19 Syndrome
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-viral diseases, including post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), cause substantial long-term morbidity. Persistent cardiovascular (CV) risk after acute infection highlights the need for accessible tools to quantify microvascular health.
methodsThe "All Eyes on PCS" is a prospective observational study assessing the microcirculation using retinal vessel analysis (RVA). Both dynamic and static parameters (DVA and SVA) were compared across never SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals (NI, n = 96), SARS-CoV-2 recovered individuals (n = 102), and PCS patients (n = 102), including a subgroup fulfilling ME/CFS criteria (n = 62). Analyses were complemented by propensity score-based weighting and multivariable adjustment. Associations with symptom severity and circulating biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation were examined.
resultsPCS patients showed reduced venular flicker-induced dilation compared with recovered individuals (3.7% ± 2.2 vs. 4.8% ± 3.0, p = 0.006) and narrower retinal arterioles (CRAE) compared with both recovered (178.3 ± 15.5 μm vs. 186.1 ± 15.7 μm, p = 0.001) and NI individuals (184.4 ± 14.3 μm, p = 0.009). Arteriolar-to-venular ratio (AVR) was lower in PCS compared with NI (0.83 ± 0.06 vs. 0.87 ± 0.06, p < 0.001) and recovered participants (0.86 ± 0.07, p = 0.034). Findings remained largely consistent after age and sex balancing and adjustment for CV risk factors, although the association for AVR was attenuated. PCS patients fulfilling ME/CFS criteria showed the most pronounced retinal microvascular alterations, and a combined model discriminated ME/CFS patients with good accuracy (AUC = 0.79). Higher symptom burden was associated with lower AVR (r = - 0.21, p = 0.037), particularly for neurocognitive symptoms. IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were elevated in PCS and ME/CFS, and lower AVR was associated with inflammatory and iron-related markers (all adjusted p < 0.01).
conclusionsPCS is associated with persistent endothelial dysfunction, most pronounced in ME/CFS patients and linked to symptom severity and ongoing inflammation. These findings support the potential use of RVA as a non-invasive tool for assessing and monitoring endothelial health in post-viral syndromes, with implications for cardiovascular risk stratification.
trial registrationThe All Eyes on PCS Study has previously been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05635552).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.