ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Clinical outcomes and opportunities for improvement across modified trauma quality improvement cohorts: a registry-based cohort study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) relies primarily on risk-adjusted mortality benchmarking, yet mortality alone may overlook non-fatal morbidity and care-process failures, particularly in cohorts where outcomes are driven by injury severity. This study aimed to analyse and compare 30-day mortality, cause of death, functional outcomes as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and opportunities for improvement (OFIs) identified through peer review across modified TQIP cohorts.
methodsRegistry-based cohort study of 8,298 trauma patients at Karolinska University Hospital (2013-2023), classified into four modified TQIP cohorts: isolated severe TBI, blunt multisystem with TBI, blunt multisystem without TBI, and penetrating truncal injury. Remaining patients, of lower severity on average, formed a non-TQIP reference cohort. Cohort associations with mortality, unfavourable GOS, and OFI were assessed using cumulative sequential logistic regression (reference: non-TQIP cohort), progressively adjusting for patient characteristics, physiological status, and care processes, pooled across 20 imputed datasets. Cause of death, GOS levels, and OFI categories were compared using multinomial logistic regression.
resultsAll TQIP cohorts had elevated odds of mortality and unfavourable GOS. The blunt multisystem cohorts had the highest OFI rates (10.6% with TBI, 16.9% without) and were the only cohorts with elevations across all OFI categories, including potentially preventable deaths and clinical judgement errors. Care-process adjustment (e.g. emergency interventions, time to radiology, care level) reduced their mortality ORs, suggesting potentially modifiable processes. Isolated severe TBI had the highest mortality (52.8%) but no OFI excess, suggesting outcomes driven by primary injury rather than care-process failures. Penetrating truncal injury showed high, potentially preventable, haemorrhage-related mortality but favourable functional recovery in survivors after care-process adjustment.
conclusionsOutcome profiles differed across TQIP cohorts and were not captured by mortality alone: isolated severe TBI had the highest mortality but no OFI excess, while the blunt multisystem cohorts had the greatest OFI burden and potentially preventable deaths despite lower mortality. Penetrating truncal injury showed high haemorrhage-related mortality but favourable functional recovery in survivors. Integrating functional outcomes and structured peer review alongside mortality identifies cohorts amenable to quality improvement and reveals cohort-specific processes to target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.