ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Toward accessible quantification of bone mineral density: feasibility of radiographic bone aluminum equivalence (RBAE) determined by digital radiography against DEXA and CT in translational sheep model.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to explore an accessible quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) through Radiographic Bone Aluminium Equivalence (RBAE) as determined by Digital Radiography (DR), compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and computed tomography (CT) in ex vivo animal model.
methodsMetacarpal and metatarsal bones (n = 24) from skeletally mature sheep were imaged using standard DR, DEXA, and CT protocols. DR-derived BMD values were calculated from calibrated greyscale intensities using an aluminum step-wedge and image-analysis workflow. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between the different modalities, whereas the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess agreement between the measurement methods.
resultsDR-derived BMD as expressed as BRAE demonstrated strong linear correlation with DEXA (r = 0.779, p = 0.001) and moderate linear correlation with CT (r = 0.536, p = 0.04). Across all imaging modalities, metatarsal bones exhibited significantly higher BMD than metacarpal bones, with clear bilateral symmetry observed within each bone type. The consistency of results across modalities strengthens the validity of the findings and supports the reliability of each technique for detecting biologically meaningful differences in BMD. The agreement between DEXA, CT and digital radiography underscores the feasibility of using radiographic BMD to quantify BMD.
conclusionDigital radiography, supported by standardized calibration and analysis, yields a reproducible BMD estimates that align closely with DEXA and CT measurements. These findings highlight DR as a cost-effective and accessible option for BMD assessment, while providing valuable baseline insight into normal mineral distribution. This information supports future research on pathological bone loss, imaging validation, and therapeutic strategies to improve bone quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.