ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026
Implementing a Cold Debrief Program in the Emergency Department: A Framework for Reflection and System Improvement.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of debriefing can be diverse and may include psychological support, departmental quality improvement or an educational focus. There has been increased attention on 'hot debriefs', however, competing clinical and departmental demands can limit the ability of response teams to meaningfully reflect on critical cases. 'Cold debriefs' are a delayed form of debriefing, occurring days to weeks after the critical event. This article reflects on the implementation of a cold debriefing model within a tertiary emergency department in Australia utilising Lewin's Theory of planned change. Over a 12-month period, 16 referrals for cold debriefs were received, of which 11 were selected to proceed to a formal debrief, with all clinical and non-clinical staff involved in the critical event invited to participate. A standardised and reproducible framework was introduced for facilitators to ensure psychological safety. By offering a cold debriefing process for specific critical events, cold debriefs not only support the clinical team but may also harness opportunities for systems improvement. Ensuring the sustainability of the Cold debrief program required integration and familiarisation within the emergency department, building a stable pool of facilitators and providing remuneration for participants attending outside of rostered work hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.