Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42625129›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026

Implementing a Cold Debrief Program in the Emergency Department: A Framework for Reflection and System Improvement.

Jennifer Jamieson, Deborah Edwards, Rebekah Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer JamiesonEmergency Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1155-4522
Deborah EdwardsEmergency Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4057-6247
Rebekah ColeEmergency Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9651-2168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of debriefing can be diverse and may include psychological support, departmental quality improvement or an educational focus. There has been increased attention on 'hot debriefs', however, competing clinical and departmental demands can limit the ability of response teams to meaningfully reflect on critical cases. 'Cold debriefs' are a delayed form of debriefing, occurring days to weeks after the critical event. This article reflects on the implementation of a cold debriefing model within a tertiary emergency department in Australia utilising Lewin's Theory of planned change. Over a 12-month period, 16 referrals for cold debriefs were received, of which 11 were selected to proceed to a formal debrief, with all clinical and non-clinical staff involved in the critical event invited to participate. A standardised and reproducible framework was introduced for facilitators to ensure psychological safety. By offering a cold debriefing process for specific critical events, cold debriefs not only support the clinical team but may also harness opportunities for systems improvement. Ensuring the sustainability of the Cold debrief program required integration and familiarisation within the emergency department, building a stable pool of facilitators and providing remuneration for participants attending outside of rostered work hours.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalQuality ImprovementAustraliaCognitive ReflectionHumansProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID42625129
PMCPMC13493538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.